Pollock fishery regulation: «precautionary approach» or maximum sustainable yeild?
https://doi.org/10.36038/0234-2774-2023-24-3-7-20
Abstract
For more than two decades, the «precautionary approach» has been the basis for regulating the fishery of most targets of international and domestic fishery, aimed at the implementation of fish catches at a relatively low level, ensuring the safest state of stocks and the highest productivity. Another management concept currently in use is the improved Maximum Sustained Yield (MSY) approach, which focuses on fishing at the maximum level without exceeding a safe level of stock status. The results of the application of two concepts of fishery regulation given in the work on the example of walleye pollock in the Navarin region of the Bering Sea and the northern part of the Sea of Okhotsk in 2002–2022, showed that the application of the modern MSY concept allows to increase catches by 15–30% compared to recommendations for the fishery based on the «precautionary approach».
About the Authors
O. A. BulatovRussian Federation
Moscow, 105187
D. A. Vasilyev
Russian Federation
Moscow, 105187
References
1. Бабаян В.К. Предосторожный подход к оценке общего допустимого улова (ОДу). М.: ВНИРО, 2000. 192 с.
2. Булатов О.А., Васильев Д.А. Размножение, запасы и промысел минтая в Наваринском районе Берингова моря // Труды ВНИРО. 2022. Т. 189. С. 95–104.
3. Beverton R.J., Holt S.J. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations // U.K. Min. Agr. Fish. Food Fish. Invest. 1957. Ser. 2. V. 19. P. 1–533.
4. Graham M. Modern theory of exploiting a fishery, an application to North Sea trawling // Jo. Conseil pour l’Exploration de la Mer. 1935. № 10. P. 264–274.
5. ICES. 1998. Report of the Precautionary Approach to Fisheries Management, Copenhagen, 3–6 February 1998. ICES CM 1998 // ACFM:10. 36 p.
6. ICES. 2012. Report of the Workshop 3 on Implementing the ICES Fmsy Framework. ICES WKFRAME3 REPORT 2012. ICES Advisory Committee, ICES CM 2012 // ACOM:39. 29 p.
7. ICES. 2021. ICES fisheries management reference points for category 1 and 2 stocks. Technical Guidelines. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2021. ICES Advice 2021, Section 16.4.3.1. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.7891.
8. ICES. 2023. Advice on fishing opportunities. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2023. ICES Advice 2023. section 1.1.1. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.22240624.
9. Lassen H., Kelly C., Sissenwine М. ICES Advisory Framework 1977–2012: From MSY to Precautionary Approach and Back. C.M. 2012/L:07 Theme L: Evolution of management frameworks to prevent overfishing. 15 p.
10. Ricker W.E. Stock and recruitment // J. Fish. Res. Board Can.1954. V. 11. № 5. P. 559–623.
11. Russell E.S. Some theoretical considerations on the ‘overfishing’ problem // Jo. Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer. 1931. № 6. P. 1–20.
12. Thompson W.F., Bell F.H. Biological statistics of the Pacific halibut fishery. (2) Effects of changes in intensity upon total yield and yield per unit of gear // International Fisheries Commission Report. 1934. № 8. 47 p. https://iphc.int/uploads/pdf/sr/IPHC-1934-SR008.pdf.
13. Vasilyev D. Key aspects of robust fish stock assessment. M.: VNIRO Publish, 2005. 105 p.
Review
For citations:
Bulatov O.A., Vasilyev D.A. Pollock fishery regulation: «precautionary approach» or maximum sustainable yeild? Problems of Fisheries. 2023;24(3):7–20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36038/0234-2774-2023-24-3-7-20