STANDARDIZATION OF THE RED KING CRAB FISHERY EFFICIENCY IN THE RUSSIAN PART IN THE BARENTS SEA IN 2010-2018 USING GENERALIZED LINEAR MODEL
Abstract
A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to assess the factors affecting the red king crab fishery efficiency in the Russian EEZ in the Barents Sea in 2010-2018. It was found that the efficiency dynamics mostly depend on production factors (type of trap and vessel), rather than environmental factors (depth, temperature, salinity, bottom type, distance from the coast). Stepby-step inclusion of factors in the standardization model has shown that the annual fishery efficiency dynamics in addition to the year effect (40% of the explained variance) are mostly influenced by the following factors: vessel, trap type, number of traps in order, month (or week). It is possible that the temperature factor significance will be increased with an increase in the fishing season, whereas now, subject to the short fishing seasons in 2014-2018, its contribution is insignificant.
About the Author
S. V. Bakanev
Polar branch of The Russian Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography (PINRO Murmansk)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Бабаян В. К., Булгакова Т. И., Васильев Д. А. и др. Оценка запасов и ОДУ минтая в Охотском море с использованием данных ИС «Рыболовство» // Тр. ВНИ- РО. 2014. Т. 151. С. 3-17.
2. Баканев С. В. Оценка состояния запаса камчатского краба (Paralithodes camtschaticus) в российских водах Баренцева моря в 1994-2011 гг. // Тр. ВНИРО. 2014. Том 151. С. 27-35.
3. Баканев С. В. Оценка запаса камчатского краба в Баренцевом море с использованием моделей истощения // Вопр. рыболовства. 2015. Т. 16. № 4. С.465-476.
4. Баканев С. В. Оценка правила регулирования промысла камчатского краба (Paralithodes camtschaticus) в российских водах Баренцева моря // Тр. ВНИРО. 2016. Т. 163. С. 25-35.
5. Кулик В. В. Использование температуры поверхности океана при оценке запаса тихоокеанской сайры (Cololabis saira) в Комиссии по рыболовству в северной части Тихого океана // Процессы в геосредах. 2018. Т. 3. № 17. С. 76-77.
6. Титов О. В., Ожигин В. К., Гусев Е. В., Ившин В. А. Теория функционирования экосистемы Баренцева моря: промыслово-океанографические аспекты // Матер. отчет. сессии ПИНРО, посвященной 85-летию института. Мурманск: Изд-во ПИНРО, 2007. С.176-192.
7. Bentley N., Kendrick T. H., Starr P. J., Breen P. A. Influence plots and metrics: tools for better understanding fisheries catch-per-unit-effort standardizations // ICES J. Marine Science. 2012. V. 69. P 84-88.
8. Bishop J. Standardizing fisherydependent catch and effort data in complex fisheries with technology change // Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 2006. V. 16. P. 21-38.
9. Harley S. J., Myers R. A., Dunn A. Is catch-per-unit-effort proportional to abundance? // Canadian J. of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2001. V. 58. P. 1760-1772.
10. Hilborn R., Walters C. J. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1992. 570 p.
11. Maunder M. N., Punt A. E. Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches // Fisheries Research. 2004. V. 70.№ 2-3. P. 141-159.
12. Maunder M. N., Sibert J. R., Fonteneau A., et al. Interpreting catch per unit effort data to assess the status of individual stocks and communities // ICES J. Marine Science. 2006. V. 63. P. 1373-1385.
13. Venables W., Dichmont C. M. GLMs, GAMs and GLMMs: an overview of theory for applications in fisheries research // Fisheries Research. 2004. V. 70. P. 315-333.
14. Ye Y., Dennis D. How reliable are the abundance indices derived from commercial catch-effort standardization? //Canadian J. of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2009. V. 66. P. 1169-1178.
Review
For citations:
Bakanev S.V. STANDARDIZATION OF THE RED KING CRAB FISHERY EFFICIENCY IN THE RUSSIAN PART IN THE BARENTS SEA IN 2010-2018 USING GENERALIZED LINEAR MODEL. Problems of Fisheries. 2019;20(3):363-373. (In Russ.)
Email this article 