The impact of abiotic and biotic environmental factors on the recruitment of northeastern Arctic haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus
https://doi.org/10.36038/0234-2774-2025-26-2-23-36
EDN: BMJNZL
Abstract
The paper presents the results of the impact of abiotic and biotic environmental factors on the recruitment of northeastern Arctic haddock. Temperature, especially water temperature in the first winter, was found to have the most impact. There was a statistically significant negative relationship found between the haddock recruitment and the ice cover parameters and the oxygen concentration. When using generalized linear and additive models, there was a statistically significant relationship found between haddock recruitment and the total stock biomass of northeastern Atlantic cod. Being the main drivers of the haddock recruitment, temperature during the first winter and cod stock size work as antagonists so the higher is the temperature and the lower is the cod stock, the higher is the haddock recruitment.
About the Authors
S. V. Bakanev
Polar branch of the State Science Center of the Russian Federation «VNIRO»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Murmansk, 183038
A. A. Russkikh
Polar branch of the State Science Center of the Russian Federation «VNIRO»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Murmansk, 183038
References
1. Бабаян В.К., Булгакова Т.И., Васильев Д.А. и др. Оценка запасов и ОДУ минтая восточной части Охотского моря с использованием данных ИС «Рыболовство» // Тр. ВНИРО. 2014. Т. 151. С. 3–17.
2. Кляшторин Л.Б., Любушин А.А. Циклические изменения климата и рыбопродуктивности. М: Изд. ВНИРО, 2005. 235 с.
3. Ковцова М.В., Мухина Н.В., Двинина Е.А. Воздействие океанологических и биологических факторов на выживаемость аркто-норвежской пикши в период раннего онтогенеза // Вопросы промысловой океанологии Северного бассейна. Сб. науч. тр./ПИНРО. Мурманск, 1989. С. 126– 138.
4. Кулик В.В., Пранц C.В., Будянский М.В.и др. Связь запасов чёрного палтуса в Охотском море с факторами внешней среды // Известия ТИНРО. 2020. Т. 200. № 1. С. 58–81.
5. Лепесевич Ю.М. Урожайность поколений и промысел северо-восточной арктической пикши Melanogrammus aeglefinus (Linne): дисс... канд. биол. наук: Москва, 2003. 181 с.
6. Медик В.А., Токмачев М.С., Фишман Б.Б. Статистика в медицине и биологии: руководство в 2-х томах. Т. 1. М.: Медицина, 2000. 412 с.
7. Мухина Н.В. Динамика численности пикши (Melanogrammus aeglefinus L.) Баренцева моря в раннем онтогенезе: дисс... канд. биол. наук: Мурманск, 2000. 132 с.
8. Сонина М.А. Миграции пикши Баренцева моря и факторы, их определяющие // Тр. ПИНРО. 1969. Вып. 26. 126 с.
9. Пономаренко И.Я., Ярагина Н.А. Питание и пищевые отношения. Треска в экосистеме Баренцева моря // Треска Баренцева моря: биология и промысел. Изд. 2-е. Мурманск: Изд-во ПИНРО, 2003. С. 62–113.
10. Сонина М.А. Плодовитость аркто-норвежской пикши в связи с динамикой популяции // Тр. ПИНРО. 1973. Вып. 33. С. 171– 201.
11. Филин А.А., Русских А.А. Особенности формирования численности поколений северо-восточной арктической пикши Melanogrammus aeglefinus в условиях потепления Баренцева моря // Вопр. ихтиологии, 2019. Т. 59. № 2. С. 195–203. DOI 10.1134/S0042875219020061.
12. Черниенко И.С. Стандартизация производительности промысла краба-стригуна опилио западной части Берингова моря с использованием аддитивных линейных моделей // Изв. ТИНРО. 2021. Т. 201. № 2. С. 359–370.
13. Bogstad B., Dingsør G.E., Ingvaldsen R.I., Gjøsæter H. Changes in the relationship between sea temperature and recruitment of cod, haddock and herring in the Barents Sea // Marine Biology Research, 2013. 9:9, Р. 895–907, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2013.775451
14. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Springer. 2002. 488 p.
15. Dingsør G.E., Ciannelli L, Chan K-S et al. Density dependence and density independence during the early life stages of four marine fish stocks // Ecology. 2007. 88(3). Р. 625–634
16. Dolgov A.V., Orlova E.L., Johannesen E., Bogstad B. Piscivorous fish // The Barents Sea: ecosystem, resources, management. Half a century of Russian-Norwegian cooperation / Eds. Jakobsen T., Ozhigin V.K. Trondheim: Tapir Acad. 2011. Press. P. 201–214.
17. ICES. 2016. Report of the second Workshop on Management Plan Evaluation on Northeast Arctic cod and haddock and Barents Sea capelin (WKNEAMP-2), 25–28 January 2016, Kirkenes, Norway. ICES CM 2016/ACOM:47. 76 p.
18. ICES. 2020. Report of the benchmark Workshop for Demersal Species (WKDEM). ICES Scientific Reports, 2020. 2:31. 136 p. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5548
19. ICES. 2021. Report of the Working Group on the Integrated Assessments of the Barents Sea (WGIBAR). ICES Scientific Reports. 2021. V. 3:77. 236 p. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8241
20. ICES. 2022. Report of the Working Group on the Integrated Assessments of the Barents Sea (WGIBAR). ICES Scientific Reports. 2022. 4:50. 235 p. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.20051438
21. JRN-AFWG. 2024a. Advice on fishing opportunities for Barents Sea Capelin in 2024 ICES subareas 1 and 2 excluding Division 2.a west of 5°W, Report series: IMR-PINRO 2024-3. 15 p. https://www.hi.no/hi/nettrapporter/imr-pinro-en-2024-3
22. JRN-AFWG. 2024b. Advice on fishing opportunities for Northeast Arctic haddock in 2025 ICES subareas 1 and 2, Report series: IMR-PINRO 2024-3. 15 p. https://www.hi.no/hi/nettrapporter/ imr-pinro-en-2024-3
23. JRN-AFWG. 2024c. Report of the Joint Russian-Norwegian Working Group on Arctic Fisheries (JRN-AFWG), Report series: IMR-PINRO 2024-7. 305 p. https://www.hi.no/hi/nettrapporter/imr-pinro-en-2024-7
24. Landa C.S., Ottersen G., Sundby S. et al. Recruitment, distribution boundary and habitat temperature of an arcto-boreal gadoid in a climatically changing environment: a case study on Northeast Arctic haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) // Fish. Oceanogr., 2014. V. 23. № 6. Р. 506–520.
25. Olsen E., Aanes S., Mehl S. et al. 2010. Cod, haddock, saithe, herring, and capelin in the Barents Sea and adjacent waters: a review of the biological value of the area // ICES J. Mar. Sci., 2010. V. 67. № 1. P. 87–101.
26. Russkikh A.A. Factors affecting the stock recruitment of north-east arctic haddock. Poster presented at the Johan Hjort symposium on recruitment dynamics and stock variability, Bergen, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2015-0491
27. Russkikh A.A., Dingsør G.E. Haddock. Chapter 5.5. // The Barents Sea: ecosystem, resources, management. Half a century of Russian-Norwegian cooperation / Eds. Jakobsen T., Ozhigin V.K. Trondheim: Tapir Acad. Press, 2011. P. 271–280.
28. Solemdal P., Mukhina, N.V., Knutsen T., at al. Maturation, spawning and egg drift of ArctoNorwegian haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus). Poster presented at the Fisheries Society of the British Isles Annual Symposium, 8–11 July 1997. University College, Galway, Ireland.
29. Sutton R.T., Hodson, D.L.R. Atlantic Ocean forcing of North American and European Summer Climate. Science 309. 2005. P. 115–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1109496
Review
For citations:
Bakanev S.V., Russkikh A.A. The impact of abiotic and biotic environmental factors on the recruitment of northeastern Arctic haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus. Problems of Fisheries. 2025;26(2):23-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36038/0234-2774-2025-26-2-23-36. EDN: BMJNZL
Email this article 