Pink Oncorhynchus gorbuscha and chum O. keta (Salmonidae, Salmoniformes) Salmon stock and fishery conditions in places of their intensive hatchery propagation
https://doi.org/10.36038/0234-2774-2021-22-4-140-181
Abstract
Pink and chum salmon are the most popular Pacific salmon species for hatchery propagation comprising together more than 87% of Pacific salmon juveniles released into the North Pacific Ocean. These two species heavily contribute to the total Pacific salmon harvest-85.7% in numbers and 80.0% by weight since 2001. Last years, efficiency of pink and chum salmon hatchery propagation started to decline under the recent climate changes. Ocean heat waves impact the southern part of salmon area, where 95% of hatcheries are located southward from 50°N. Hatchery juveniles mortality increases and hatchery salmon impact on wild salmon stocks looks to be overestimated. Despite the emerging crisis situation in the salmon hatchery propagation, the issues of adopting its technologies and management are almost being not investigated. The results of otolith marking are not published regularly. It is necessary to revise the efficiency of the existing hatcheries, develop an adaptive strategy for the further development of hatchery propagation, which will be based on the principles of their concentration in relatively isolated areas to allow fishing mainly for hatchery pink and chum salmon. Extensive experimental work is required on the basis of federal-owned fish hatcheries using new advances in genetics and genomics, as well as conducting biochemical and genetic monitoring of salmon run along with parasitological one.
About the Author
V. I. Radchenko
North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission (NPAFC)
Canada
Canada
Vancouver V6C 3B2
References
1. Акиничева Е.Г., Шубин А.О., Стекольщикова М.Ю. Современное состояние исследований по маркированию и идентификации заводских лососей в Сахалино-Курильском регионе // Тр. СахНИРО. 2012. Т. 13. С. 83–90.
2. Антонов А.А., Буслов А.В., Брагина И.Ю. и др. Результаты мечения горбуши у юго-восточного побережья острова Сахалин в 2014 г. // Бюллетень изучения тихоокеанских лососей на Дальнем Востоке. 2014. № 9. С. 154–157.
3. Белоусов А., Пахомова Л., Аладьина Е. Воспроизводство рыбных запасов, итоги года // Рыбн. хоз-во. 2002. № 2. С. 39–41.
4. Бойко А.В. Экологические особенности искусственного воспроизводства тихоокеанских лососей в условиях современных рыбоводных заводов Сахалинской области. Дис. … канд. биол. наук. Южно-Сахалинск: ФГБОУ ВПО «СахГУ», 2014. 166 с.
5. Ельников А.Н., Лепская В.А., Вараксин И.А. Прогнозирование численности кеты на Южных Курильских островах // Тр. ВНИРО. 2019. Т. 177. С. 17–27.
6. Ефанов В.Н., Бойко А.В. Экологические особенности и оптимизация условий искусственного воспроизводства тихоокеанских лососей на современных рыбоводных заводах Сахалинской области. Южно-Сахалинск, Изд-во СахГУ. 2014. 124 с.
7. Запорожец Г.В., Запорожец О.М. Лососеводство в зарубежных странах Северотихоокеанского региона // Исслед. вод. биол. ресурсов Камчатки и сев.-зап. части Тихого океана. 2011. Вып. 22. С. 28–48.
8. Запорожец Г.В., Запорожец О.М. Структура возврата, численность и биологические характеристики заводской и дикой кеты в бассейне реки Паратунки (юго-восточная Камчатка) в 2010–2015 гг. // Изв. ТИНРО. 2017. Т. 190. С. 49–61.
9. Зеленников О.В., Проскуряков К.А., Рудакова Г.С., Мякишев М.С. Сравнительная характеристика молоди горбуши Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Walbaum, при ее естественном и заводском воспроизводстве в Сахалинской области // Биол. моря. 2020. Т. 46. № 1. С. 14–23.
10. Каев А.М. Некоторые вопросы динамики стада горбуши в связи с ее темпоральной структурой // Бюллетень № 5 реализации «Концепции дальневосточной бассейновой программы изучения тихоокеанских лососей». Владивосток: ТИНРО-Центр. 2010. С. 89–96.
11. Каев А.М., Игнатьев Ю.И. Развитие заводского разведения тихоокеанских лососей в Сахалино-Курильском регионе и его значение для промысла // Тр. ВНИРО. 2015. Т. 153. С. 95–104.
12. Каев А.М., Ромасенко Л.В. Горбуша и кета острова Кунашир (структура популяций, воспроизводство, промысел). Южно-Сахалинск: СахГУ. 2017. 124 с.
13. Карпенко В.И. Ранний морской период жизни тихоокеанских лососей. М.: ВНИРО. 1998. 165 с.
14. Кловач Н.В., Леман В.Н., Ельников А.Н., Вараксин И.А. Воспроизводство и промысел кеты о. Итуруп (южные Курильские острова): прошлое, настоящее, будущее // Рыбн. хоз-во. 2018. № 6. С. 42–47.
15. Кузнецова Н.А., Шебанова М.А. Состояние планктонного сообщества в прикурильских водах при современном возобновлении массовых нагульных северных миграций субтропических рыб // Изв. ТИНРО. 2017. Т. 190. С. 119–131.
16. Лаврик М.А. Проведение этапа выращивания молоди ценных видов рыб в искусственном воспроизводстве, в зависимости от видовых особенностей // Лучшие практики рыбохозяйственного образования: сб. матлов Всеросс. научно-практической школыконференции (18–21 октября 2016 г.) / Под ред. Ефанова В.Н. Санкт-Петербург: Изд-во ООО «ИНФОСТИ». 2016. С. 100–108.
17. Леман В.Н., Смирнов Б.П., Точилина Т.Г. Пастбищное лососеводство на Дальнем Востоке: современное состояние и существующие проблемы // Тр. ВНИРО. 2015. Т. 153. С. 105– 120.
18. Линдберг Г.У., Фёдоров В.В., Красюкова З.В. Рыбы Японского моря и сопредельных частей Охотского и Жёлтого морей. Часть 7. СПб.: Гидрометеоиздат. 1997. 350 с.
19. Лисицын Д.В. Проблемы сохранения и использования тихоокеанских лососей на Сахалине. Электронная публикация. Март 2014 г. Доступна по адресу https://ecosakh.ru/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/tixoakeanskii_lososi.pdf (дата просмотра 29 окт. 2021 г.).
20. Литвиненко А.В., Корнеева Е.И. Опыт выращивания молоди кеты на лососевом рыбоводном заводе «Бухта Оля» // Изв. КГТУ. 2017. № 44. С. 28–37.
21. Мякишев М.С., Иванова M.A., Зеленников О.В. К вопросу о мечении молоди тихоокеанских лососей и эффективности работы рыбоводных заводов // Биол. моря. 2019. Т. 45. № 5. С. 342–348.
22. Радченко В.И. Динамика численности горбуши Oncorhynchus gorbuscha в бассейне Охотского моря в 90-е гг. // Биол. моря. 2001. Т. 27. № 2. С. 91–101.
23. Радченко В.И. О совпадении трендов динамики численности горбуши поколений чётных и нечётных лет в сахалино-курильском регионе // Изв. ТИНРО. 2006. Т. 145. С. 39–55.
24. Росгидромет (Федеральная служба по гидрометеорологии и мониторингу окружающей среды). Доклад об особенностях климата на территории Российской Федерации за 2016 год. М.: Росгидромет. 2017. 70 с.
25. Сергеенко Т.М. Морфофизиологическая характеристика молоди кеты (Oncorhynchus keta Walbaum) при её воспроизводстве на лососевых рыбоводных заводах Сахалина. Автореф. дис. … канд. биол. наук. ЮжноСахалинск: СахНИРО, 2007. 25 с.
26. Смирнов Б.П., Федорова Л.К., Борзов С.И., Погодин В.П. Заводское воспроизводство тихоокеанских лососей на южных Курильских островах: история, современное состояние и перспективы // Современные проблемы лососевых рыбоводных заводов Дальнего Востока: Мат-лы междунар. научн. семинара в рамках VII научной конференции «Сохранение биоразнообразия Камчатки и прилегающих морей», 30.11–1.12.2006 г. ПетропавловскКамчатский: Камчатский печатный двор. 2006. С. 199–206.
27. Стекольщикова М.Ю. Некоторые результаты мониторинга заводских стад горбуши зал. Анива (о. Сахалин) // Изв. ТИНРО. 2015. Т. 183. С. 51–60.
28. Темных О.С. Азиатская горбуша в морской период жизни: биология, пространственная дифференциация, место и роль в пелагических сообществах: Дис. … докт. биол. наук. Владивосток: ТИНРО-Центр, 2004. 466 с.
29. Чистякова А.И., Бугаев А.В., Ким О.О. Применение результатов отолитного маркирования для определения доли заводской молоди горбуши и кеты в период осенних миграций в Охотском море в 2014 г. // Бюллетень изучения тихоокеанских лососей на Дальнем Востоке. 2015. № 10. С. 147–152.
30. Чмилевский Д.А. Оогенез рыб как чувствительная тест-система при воздействии факторов различной природы / Тез. докл. V Всес. конф. по раннему онтогенезу рыб. Астрахань, 1–3.10.1991 г. М.: ВНИРО. 1991. С. 218–219.
31. Шевляков Е.А., Чистякова А.И. Миграции молоди кеты в Охотском море, сравнительный анализ эффективности деятельности предприятий рыбоводного комплекса Дальнего Востока России и Японии // Изв. ТИНРО. 2017. Т. 191. С. 79–96.
32. Шунтов В.П., Темных О.С. Тихоокеанские лососи в морских и океанических экосистемах. Владивосток: ТИНРО-центр, 2008. Т. 1. 481 с.
33. Akinicheva E., Volobuev V., Fomin E., Myakishev M. Marked salmon production by the hatcheries of Russia in 2015 // N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Com. Doc. 1630. 2016. 4 p.
34. Amaya D.J., Miller A.J., Xie S.-P., Kosaka Y. Physical drivers of the summer 2019 North Pacific marine heatwave // Nat. Commun. 2020. V. 11. № 1903
35. Amoroso R.O., Tillotson M.D., Hilborn R. Measuring the net biological impact of fisheries enhancement: pink salmon hatcheries can increase yield, but with apparent costs to wild populations // Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2017. V. 74. P. 1233–1242.
36. Araki H., Berejikian B.A., Ford M.J., Blouin M.S. Fitness of hatchery-reared salmonids in the wild // Evol. Appl. 2008. V. 1. № 2. P. 342– 355.
37. Beamish R.J., Thomson B.L., McFarlane G.A. Spiny Dogfish predation on Chinook and Coho Salmon and the potential effects on hatchery-produced salmon // Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1992. V. 121. P. 444–455.
38. Beamish R.J., Sweeting R.M., Neville C.M., Lange K.L. Competitive interactions between pink salmon and other juvenile Pacific salmon in the Strait of Georgia // N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Com. Doc. V. 1284. 2010. 26 p.
39. Becker E. Decemb er 2017 L a Niña update: Double, double. E-publication https:// www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/ december-2017-la-niña-update-double-double (accessed 29 Oct. 2021).
40. Beetz J.L. Marine survival of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in Washington State: Characteristic patterns and their relationships to environmental and biological factors. Master’s thesis. Seattle. University of Washington. 2009. 118 p.
41. Bigler B.S., Welch D.W., Helle J.H. A review of size trends among North Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. // Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1996. V. 53. P. 455–465.
42. Billard B., Br y C., Gillet C. Stress, environment, and reproduction in teleost fish. In: Pickering A.D. (ed.). Stress and fish. Academic Press, New York. 1990. P. 185–207.
43. Boldt J.L., Haldorson L.J. A bioenergetics approach to estimating consumption of zooplankton by juvenile pink salmon in Prince William Sound, Alaska // Alaska Fish. Res. Bull. 2002. V. 9. P. 111–127.
44. Boldt J.L., Haldorson L.J. Size and condition of wild and hatchery pink salmon juveniles in Prince William Sound, Alaska // Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2004. V. 133. № 1. P. 173–184.
45. Bond N.A., Cronin M.F., Freeland H., Mantua N. Causes and impacts of the 2014 warm anomaly in the NE Pacific // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2015. V. 42. P. 3414–3420.
46. Botz J., Russel C.W. 2020 Prince William Sound salmon season summary. ADF&G Advisory Announcement. October 9, 2020. 4 p.
47. Brannon E.L., Collins K., Cronin M.A. et al. Review of the Exxon Valdez oil spill effects on pink salmon in Prince William Sound, Alaska // Rev Fish Sci. 2012. V. 20. P. 20–60.
48. Brenner R.E., Munro A.R., Larsen S.J. (eds). Run forecasts and harvest projections for 2019 Alaska salmon fisheries and review of the 2018 season. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Special Publication № 19–07, Anchorage. 2019. 96 p.
49. Brenner R.E., Larsen S.J., Munro A.R., Carroll A.M. (eds). Run forecasts and harvest projections for 2020 Alaska salmon fisheries and review of the 2019 season. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Special Publication № 20–06, Anchorage. 2020. 75 p.
50. Carlson S.M., Seamons T.R. A review of quantitative genetic components of fitness in salmonids: implications for adaptation to future change // Evol. Appl. 2008. V. 1. P. 222–238.
51. Christie M.R., Marine M.L., French R.A., Blouin M.S. Genetic adaptation to captivity can occur in a single generation // PNAS. 2012. V. 109. № 1. P. 238–242.
52. Christie M.R., Marine M.L., Fox S.E. et al. A single generation of domestication heritably alters the expression of hundreds of genes // Nat. Commun. 2016. V. 7. № 10676.
53. Cross A.D., Beauchamp D.A., K.W. Myers, J.H. Moss. Early marine growth of pink salmon in Prince William Sound and the coastal Gulf of Alaska during years of low and high survival // Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2008. V. 137. № 3. P. 927– 939.
54. Crozier L.G., McClure M.M., Beechie T. et al. Climate vulnerability assessment for Pacific salmon and steelhead in the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem // PLoS One. 2019. V. 14. № 7. № 0217711.
55. Davis M.W. Simulated fishing experiments for predicting delayed mortality rates using reflex impairment in restrained fish // ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2007. V. 64. P. 1535–1542.
56. Davis M.W. Fish stress and mortality can be predicted using reflex impairment // Fish and Fisheries. 2010. V. 11. P. 1–11.
57. Doksæter L., Handegard N.O., Godø O.R. et al. Behavior of captive herring exposed to naval sonar transmissions (1.0–1.6 kHz) throughout a yearly cycle // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012. V. 131. № 2. P. 1632–1642.
58. Eggers D.M., Heinl S.C. Chum salmon stock status and escapement goals in Southeast Alaska. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Special Publication № 08–19, Anchorage. 2008. 67 p.
59. Environment and Natural Resources Institute (ENRI). Evaluating Alaska’s ocean-ranching salmon hatcheries: biologic and management issues. Univ. of Alaska Anchorage. 2001. 77 p.
60. Farrell A.P. Cardiorespiratory performance in salmonids during exercise at high temperature: insights into cardiovascular design limitations in fishes // Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A. 2002. V. 132. P. 797–810.
61. Fergusson E., Miller T., McPhee M.V. et al. Trophic responses of juvenile Pacific salmon to warm and cool periods within inside marine waters of Southeast Alaska // Prog. Oceanogr. 2020. V. 186. № 102378.
62. Fukuzawa H., Gohda Y. Preliminary 2019 salmon enhancement production in Japan. N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Com. Doc. 1885 (Rev. 1). 2020. 3 p.
63. Geiger H.J., Bue B.G., Sharr S. et al. A life history approach to estimating damage to Prince William Sound pink salmon caused by the Exxon Valdez oil spill // Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. № 18. Bethesda, MD, USA. 1996. P. 487–498.
64. Grant S., Pestal G. Certification Unit Profile: Fraser River Pink Salmon // Can. Man. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2009. № 2875: vii + 36 p.
65. Halupka K.C., Bryant M.D., Willson M.F., Everest F.H. Biological characteristics and population status of anadromous salmon in southeast Alaska / US Dep. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Gen. Tech. Rep. GTRPNW-468. 2000. 255 p.
66. Heard W.R. Overview of salmon stock enhancement in southeast Alaska and compatibility with maintenance of hatchery and wild stocks // Environ. Biol. Fish. 2012. V. 94. P. 273–283.
67. Helle J.H., Hoffman M.S. Size decline and older age at maturity of two chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) stocks in western North America, 1972–1992. In Climate change and northern fish populations. Edited by R.J. Beamish // Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1995. V. 121. P. 245–260.
68. Helle J.H., Hoffman M.S. Changes in size and age at maturity of two North American stocks of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) before and after a major regime shift in the North Pacific Ocean. N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Comm. Bull. 1998. № 1. P. 81–89.
69. Hershberger P.K., Kocan R.M., Elder N.E. et al. Management of Pacific herring closed pound spawn-on-kelp fisheries to optimize fish health and product quality // N. Am.J. Fish. Manage. 2001. V. 21. P. 550–555.
70. Hilborn R., Eggers D. A review of the hatchery programs for pink salmon in Prince William Sound and Kodiak Island, Alaska // Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2000. V. 129. P. 333–350.
71. Hilborn R., Eggers D. A review of the hatchery programs for pink salmon in Prince William Sound and Kodiak Island, Alaska: response to comment // Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2001. V. 130. № 4. P. 720–724.
72. Hiroi O. Historical trends of salmon fisheries and stock conditions in Japan // N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Com. Bull. 1998. № 1. P. 23–27.
73. Iida M., Yoshino K., Katayama S. Current status of natural spawning of chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta in rivers with or without hatchery stocking on the Japan Sea side of northern Honshu, Japan // Fish. Sci. 2018. V. 84. P. 453–459.
74. Irvine J.R., Michielsens C.J.G., O’Brien M. et al. Increasing dominance of odd-year returning Pink Salmon // Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2014. V. 143. P. 939–956.
75. Ishida Y., Ito S.O., Kaeriyama M. et al. Recent changes in age and size of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in the North Pacific Ocean and possible causes // Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1993. V. 50. P. 290–295.
76. Kaeriyama M. Dynamics of a chum salmon, Oncorhynchus keta, population released from Hokkaido in Japan // N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Com. Bull. 1998. № 1. P. 90–102.
77. Kaeriyama M. Hatchery programmes and stock management of salmonid populations in Japan. In: Howell B.R., Moksness E., Svasand T. (eds). Stock enhancement and sea ranching. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK. 1999. P. 153–167.
78. Kaeriyama M., Qin Y. Biological interactions between wild and hatchery-produced Pacific salmon. In: Woo, P.T.K., Noakes D.J. (eds.). Salmon: biology, ecological impacts and economic importance. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2014. P. 223–238.
79. Kaeriyama M., Seo H., Qin Y. Effect of global warming on the life history and population dynamics of Japanese chum salmon // Fish. Sci. 2014. V. 80. P. 251–260.
80. Kasugai K., Sakamoto H., Miyakoshi Y., Nagata M. Returns of Chum Salmon Released from Net Pens and Rivers in Eastern Hokkaido, Japan // N. Am.J. Fish. Manage. 2018. V. 38. № 1. P. 24–30.
81. Kitada S. Japanese chum salmon stock enhancement: current perspective and future challenges // Fish. Sci. 2014. V. 80. P. 237–249.
82. Kitada S. Economic, ecological and genetic impacts of marine stock enhancement and sea ranching: a systematic review // Fish Fish. 2018. V. 19. P. 511–532.
83. Kitada S. Lessons from Japan marine stock enhancement and sea ranching programmes over 100 years // Rev. Aquac. 2020. V. 12. P. 1944–1969.
84. Kitada S., Kishino K. Population structure of chum salmon and selection on the markers collected for stock identification // Ecol. Evol. 2021. V. 11. P. 13972–13985.
85. Knapp G. 2012. Trends in Alaska and world salmon markets. E-publication https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/fishing/PDFs/commercial/gk_trends_4-12-12.pdf (accessed 29 Oct. 2021).
86. Knudsen E., Buckhorn M., Gorman K. et al. Interactions of wild and hatchery pink salmon and chum salmon in Prince William Sound and Southeastern Alaska / Final Progress Report for 2013. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. 2015. Contract IHP-13–013. 55 p. + Apps.
87. Kohan M.L., Orsi J.A., Mueter F., McPhee M.V. Variation in abundance and condition of juvenile chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in the eastern Gulf of Alaska in relation to environmental variables // N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Com. Tech. Rep. 2013. № 9. P. 244–248.
88. Labelle M., Walters C.J., Riddell B. Ocean survival and exploitation of Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) stocks from the east coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia // Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1997. V. 54. P. 1433–1449.
89. Le Luyer J., Laporte M., Beacham T.D. et al. Parallel epigenetic modifications induced by hatchery rearing in a Pacific salmon // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017. 6 p.
90. Leon K.A., Dudiak N.C., Rawson C.B. Effectiveness of Alaska dry pellet (ADP) and Oregon moist pellet (OMP) fed to pink salmon in saltwater net pens // FRED Reports. 1985. V. 46. 17 p.
91. MacKinlay D.D., Lehmann S., Bateman J., Cook R. Pacific salmon hatcheries in British Columbia // American Fisheries Society Symposium. 2004. V. 44. P. 57–75.
92. Madaro A., Olsen R.E., Kristiansen T.S. et al. Stress in Atlantic salmon: response to unpredictable chronic stress // J. Exp. Biol. 2015. V. 218. P. 2538–2550.
93. McConnell C.J., Westley P.A.H., McPhee M.V. Differences between wild and hatchery-stray chum salmon despite long-term immigration by strays // Aquacult. Environ. Interact. 2018. V. 10. P. 99–113.
94. McDowell Group. Pink salmon product development and the role of the Prince William Sound Aquaculture Corporation. February 2011. E-publication accessible at https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/fishing/PDFs/hatcheries/PSPD.pdf (accessed 29 Oct. 2021)
95. Miyakoshi Y., Nagata M., Kitada S., Kaeriyama M. Historical and current hatchery programs and management of chum salmon in Hokkaido, northern Japan // Rev. Fish. Sci. 2013. V. 21. P. 469–479.
96. Morita K. Japanese wild salmon research: toward a reconciliation between hatchery and wild salmon management // NPAFC Newsletter. 2014. № 35. P. 4–14.
97. Morita K., Morita S.H., Fukuwaka M. Population dynamics of Japanese pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha): are recent increases explained by hatchery programmes or climatic variations? // Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2006a. V. 63. P. 55–62.
98. Morita K., Saito T., Miyakoshi Y. et al. A review of Pacific salmon hatchery programmes on Hokkaido Island, Japan // ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2006b. V. 63. P. 1353–1363.
99. Muhling B.A., Brodie S., Smith J.A. et al. Predictability of species distributions deteriorates under novel environmental conditions in the California Current system // Front. Mar. Sci. 2020. V. 7: № 589. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00589
100. Nagata M., Miyakoshi Y., Urabe H. et al. An overview of salmon enhancement and the need to manage and monitor natural spawning in Hokkaido, Japan // Environ. Biol. Fish. 2012. V. 94. P. 311–323.
101. Nickelson T. The influence of hatchery Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) on the productivity of wild Coho Salmon populations in Oregon coastal basins // Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2003. V. 60. P. 1050–1056.
102. North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission (NPAFC). NPAFC Statistics: Description of Pacific Salmonid Catch and Hatchery Release Data Files. 2020. 53 p. E-publication accessible at https://npafc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Metadata_1Dec2020.pdf (accessed 29 Oct. 2021)
103. Ohnuki T., Morita K., Tokuda H. et al. Numerical and economic contributions of wild and hatchery pink salmon to commercial catches in Japan estimated from mass otolith markings // N. Am.J. Fish. Manage. 2015. V. 35. № 3. P. 598– 604.
104. Ojaveer H., Tomkiewicz J., Arula T., Klais R. Female ovarian abnormalities and reproductive failure of autumn-spawning herring (Clupea harengus membras) in the Baltic Sea // ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2015. V. 72. P. 2332–2340.
105. Piston A.W., Heinl S.C. Hatchery Chum Salmon Straying Studies in Southeast Alaska, 2008–2010 / Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Fishery Manuscript Series № 12–01, Anchorage. 2012. 35 p.
106. Piston A.W., Heinl S.C. Chum salmon stock status and escapement goals in Southeast Alaska / Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Special Publication № 14–13, Anchorage. 2014. 84 p.
107. Power M. Assessing the effects of environmental stressors on fish populations // Aquat. Toxicol. 1997. V. 39. P. 151–169.
108. Pryor F. 2017 Report to the Alaska Board of Fisheries on the status of the allocation of hatchery produced salmon in the Southeast Alaska region / Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Fishery Management Report № 17–62, Anchorage. 2017. 26 p.
109. Raby G.D., Cooke S.J., Cook K.V. et al. Resilience of pink salmon and chum salmon to simulated fisheries capture stress incurred upon arrival at spawning grounds // Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2013. V. 142. № 2. P. 524–539.
110. Radchenko V.I. Bycatch of Pacific salmon in pelagic fisheries in the North Pacific Ocean: a problem requiring investigation // NPAFC Newsletter. 2017. № 42. P. 30–34.
111. Reese C., Hillgruber N., Sturdevant M. et al. Spatial and temporal distribution and the potential for estuarine interactions between wild and hatchery chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in Taku Inlet, Alaska // Fish. Bull. 2008. V. 107. P. 433–450
112. Rittenhouse M.A., Revie C.W., Hurford A. A model for sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) dynamics in a seasonally changing environment // Epidemics. 2016. V. 16. P. 8–16.
113. Ruggerone G.T., Irvine J.R. Numbers and biomass of natural- and hatchery-origin pink salmon, chum salmon, and sockeye salmon in the North Pacific Ocean, 1925–2015 // Mar. Coast. Fish. 2018. V. 10. P. 152–168.
114. Russell C.W., Botz J., Haught S., Moffitt S. 2016 Prince William Sound area finfish management report / Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Fishery Management Report № 17– 37, Anchorage. 2017. 160 p.
115. Saito T. Biological monitoring of key salmon populations: Japanese chum salmon // NPAFC Newsletter. 2015. № 37. P. 10–19.
116. Saito T., Nagasawa K. Regional synchrony in return rates of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in Japan in relation to coastal temperature and size at release // Fish. Res. 2009. V. 95. P. 14–27.
117. Saito T., Hirabayashi Y., Suzuki K. et al. Recent decline of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) abundance in Japan // N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Comm. Bull. 2016. № 6. P. 279–296.
118. Schreck C.B., Contreras-Sanchez W., Fitzpatrick M.S. Effects of stress on fish reproduction, gamete quality, and progeny // Aquaculture. 2001. V. 197. P. 3–24
119. Shimizu T., Ban M., Miyauchi Y. et al. Nutritional condition of hatchery and wild chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta fry migrating down the Chitose River // Journal of Fisheries Technology. 2016. V. 8. № 2. P. 89–94. (на японском языке).
120. Spilsted B., Pestal G. Certification Unit Profile: North Coast and Central Coast Pink Salmon // Can. Man. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2009. № 2880. P. viii + 72 p.
121. Stopha M. An evaluation of the Medvejie Creek salmon hatchery for consistency with statewide policies and prescribed management practices / Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, Regional Information Report 5J15–03, Anchorage. 2015. 90 p.
122. Stopha M. Alaska fisheries enhancement annual report 2016 / Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, Regional Information Report 5J17–04, Anchorage. 2017. 96 p.
123. Sturdevant M.V., Fergusson E., Hillgruber N. et al. Lack of trophic competition among wild and hatchery juvenile chum salmon during early marine residence in Taku Inlet, Southeast Alaska // Environ. Biol. Fishes. 2012. V. 94. P. 101–116.
124. Sweeting R.M., Beamish R.J., Neville C.M. Crystalline otoliths in teleosts: Comparisons between hatchery and wild Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in the Strait of Georgia // Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2004. V. 14. P. 361–369.
125. Tillotson M.D., Barnett H.K., Bhuthimethee M. et al. Artificial selection on reproductive timing in hatchery salmon drives a phenological shift and potential maladaptation to climate change // Evol. Appl. 2019. V. 12. P. 1344–1359.
126. Tojima T., Kuwaki M., Urawa S. Releases of otolith marked salmon from Japan between summer of 2015 and spring of 2016. NPAFC Doc. 1695. 2017. 17 p.
127. Torao M., Nagata M., Sasaki Y. et al. Evidence for existence of wild population of pink salmon in the Tohoro River system flowing into Nemuro Strait, eastern Hokkaido, Japan // Sci. Rep. Hokkaido Fish. Res. Inst. 2011. V. 80. P. 45– 49.
128. Urawa S., Irvine J.R., Kim J.K. et al. Forecasting Pacific salmon production in a changing climate: a review of the 2011–2015 NPAFC Science Plan // N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Comm. Bull. 2016. № 6. P. 501–534. doi:10.23849/npafcb6/501.534.
129. Van Will P., Brahniuk R., Pestal G. Certification Unit Profile: Inner South Coast Pink Salmon (Excluding Fraser River). Can. Man. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2009. № 2876. P. vii + 63p.
130. Wagner G.N., Hinch S.G., Kuchel L.J. et al. Metabolic rates and swimming performance of adult Fraser River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) after a controlled infection with Parvicapsula minibicornis // Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2005. V. 62. P. 2124–2133.
131. Wertheimer A.C., Smoker W.W., Joyce T.L., Heard W.R. Comment: a review of the hatchery programmes for pink salmon in Prince William Sound and Kodiak Island, Alaska // Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2001. V. 130. P. 712–720.
132. Willette T.M., Cooney R.T., Patrick V. et al. Ecological processes influencing mortality of juvenile pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) in Prince William Sound, Alaska // Fish. Oceanogr. 2001. V. 10. P. 14–41.
133. Yatsuya M., Sasaki K., Shimizu Y. et al. Effects of duration of net-pen acclimation and timing of river stocking on early growth and adult return of chum salmon along the Pacific coast of Honshu, Japan // N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Com. Tech. Rep. 2018. № 11. P. 127–128.
134. Young J.L., Bornik Z.B., Marcotte M.L. et al. Integrating physiology and life history to improve fisheries management and conservation // Fish Fish. 2006. V. 7. P. 262–283.
135. Young M., Saunders M., Radchenko V. (eds.). Story of the International Year of the Salmon: Concept to Launch // N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Com. Tech. Rep. 2017. № 10. 142 p.
136. Zhivotovsky L.A., Fedorova L.K., Rubtsova G.A. et al. Rapid expansion of an enhanced stock of chum salmon and its impacts on wild population components // Environ. Biol. Fishes. 2012. V. 94. № 1. P. 249–258.
Review
For citations:
Radchenko V.I. Pink Oncorhynchus gorbuscha and chum O. keta (Salmonidae, Salmoniformes) Salmon stock and fishery conditions in places of their intensive hatchery propagation. Problems of Fisheries. 2021;22(4):140-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36038/0234-2774-2021-22-4-140-181
Email this article 